Hope is a very central issue to me. I was almost named Hope
when I was born. I was born out of the
reconciliation of my parent’s separation, and my father wanted to name me
Hope. My mother vetoed this name. Two years later when my sister was born his
hope had died into a stubborn faith that they would continue, and so he wanted
to name her Faith. My mother vetoed this
name, and she was named Fay. Was his
hope sucessful? My parents were married
till my mother died, for 11 more years after he reached for the name Hope. But they were kept together by her dying and
would have separated if she had not become ill.
I hoped my mother would live during the two and half years
she lay dying. Hope was disappointed
when she died. Thus also began my career
of hoping for impossible things and yet needing hope to survive that which is
awful.
For me at that time the Emily Dickerson poem was truth:
Hope
is the thing with feathers
That perches in the soul,
And sings the tune without the words,
And never stops at all
That perches in the soul,
And sings the tune without the words,
And never stops at all
I then launched a lifetime of activism. As a favorite quote of mine says: “An
idealist is someone who is homesick for a land they have never been.” Certainly activists always struggle for
things that are not yet: justice, peace, community. To struggle for these things which are not
yet, one has to have hope.
Somehow I have been the champion of lost causes. I worked for years as a volunteer in prisons,
work which touched my soul and was deep and meaningful…and when I would go to
fundraise for it I would see how clearly our society judged prisoners
“hopeless”. I tried to stop nuclear
weapons which amassed more quickly than demonstrators. And now in my most challenging of impossible
causes I’m fighting climate change. So I
have spent a lot of time over the years thinking about the significance of
hope.
Recently, I went to hear Meg Wheatly, a Buddhist, talk on
being a warrior for our time. For me the
most significant part of the talk was when she talked about hope. She started to say something about the
“ambush of hope” and how people’s disappointed hope can make them give up on
what they are trying to do. She said: “The
space between hope and fear is inseparable.”
I have heard people who are without hope sort of bash hope, say it is
just a form of trickery, a fool’s gold…something to be avoided. I really cannot stand that message, it seems
so dark and so fatalistic. I was
concerned that that was where she was going.
I have usefully heard people say the opposite of love is fear…but it was
interesting to think that hope and fear are inseparable. Because yes, I had to admit that when I have
hope there is always a niggling fear somewhere that I will be wrong, be foolish
or be disappointed. And when I have
fear there is also a little niggling hope that it will be ok and everything
will turn out well.
Then Meg said she’d heard the joke: “expectation is
pre-meditated disappointment.” I laughed
in recognition of how often my expectations have brought me disappointment.
I have written in my Jan blog on Gratitude and Expectations:
“I have been
thinking about how expectations, like goals and dreams are generally a good
thing and help us aim for things and collectively move forward in life.
And yet I am aware of how we can become so attached to a dream, or a goal as to
have the expectation that life will be a certain way and experience great
disappointment or frustration when it is not that way”.
It all comes into clearer focus for me that goals, visions
and dreams are a good thing that help us move forward, but that expectations do
lead to disappointment. Certainly the
relationship between disappointment and fear is clear…and now leads to the
issue of hope. Then someone said: “I
think an aspiration is hope without expectation.” Whether one agrees with that term it does
begin to distinguish a way of hoping that is unattached.
Another person said: “Hope is being willing to face the pain
of disappointment”. Which I think speaks
to the idea that we realize there are no guarantees for the things we hope for,
and we do it anyway.
Meg then introduced these two quotes.
“Hope is not the conviction that something will turn out
well but the certainty that something makes sense, regardless of how it turns
out.” Vaclav Havel President of
Czechoslovia 1989-92
“Do not depend on the hope of results. You may have to face
the fact that your work will be apparently worthless and even achieve no result
at all, if not perhaps results opposite to what you expect. As you get used to
this idea, you start more and more to concentrate not on the results, but on
the value, the rightness, the truth of the work itself. You gradually struggle
less and less for an idea and more and more for specific people. In the end, it
is the reality of personal relationship that saves everything.”
― Thomas Merton
― Thomas Merton
These two quotes are important to me because of the work on
“Active Hope” that I have done with Joanna Macy. Joanna has been for decades, starting with
our responses to the nuclear arms race been inviting Americans to look at our
grief and despair about the world. She
says in her Work that Reconnects that we must start with gratitude for what is
and then experience our grief so we are not dragged down by it and can then see
with new eyes and be freed to act. The
part of this formula that did not resonate with me at first was gratitude. It was hard for me to notice what to be
grateful for when I was so worried!
However, my work with Joanna has been very profound.
I recall at a workshop where I felt deeply sunk in a sense
of despair over the threat of the dying of the oceans that I felt no hope. Joanna’s assistant Anne spoke and said that
she did not think we would survive but that she was sustained by “resting in
the arms of all of you, in the love of you.”
I realized as I reflected upon this that I did not know if we will
survive but that if the worst scenarios were to play out that I would still
want in the descent of humanity for us to treat each other with as much respect
as possible, without violence, to try to be fair with each other, to face our
challenges cooperatively and with love. I realized that it meant I would make
the same choices that I would make while fighting for our survival if I thought
we would not survive. I realized that I
needed not to “concentrate on the results, but on the value, the rightness, the
truth of the work itself” as Merton says.
Or as Meg Wheatly said: “It becomes “What is”. A place of gratitude. Gratitude for what we still have.”
After my experience in Joanna’s workshop my “hope”
changed. It was not desperate, it was
actually much deeper. There was a calm I
felt even in the face of much worse news.
There was the perseverance to just keep forging forward. And strangely the gratitude showed up. I felt like some people with chronic
illnesses report feeling…just grateful for all the small things. Grateful for what we still have, for as long
as we have it. Grateful to rest in the
love of community.
The English language is said to be poor in that it has only
one word for love. It does not
distinguish between the love of parents and children, from romantic love, or
the love of a comrade or for the world in general. The same could be said about the word
hope. There is this kind of hope that
has expectations and the danger of much disappointment and there is this other
kind of hope that has surrendered all expectations and that is just a steady
direction and intention for Good – an almost instinct towards Light.
No comments:
Post a Comment